If you look at movie
series, you will find that often, once a relationship is steady, a partner, usually
the female character, will vanish for some reason - death, misunderstandings,
amnesia, whatever. TV series might not be that horrible with it, but usually
the relationships fade into background, once the courting phase is over.
Looking at my own
work, I have a bit of a mixed bag. Both John Stanton, whose first three
adventures are on their way to release (it was a hectic month and I will need a
few more days to get everything ready), and Inez Crowe are not in any romantic
relationship (although I’m currently considering one for John). Jane on the
other hand has a steady relationship in both series which feature her, with
Cedric Thornton in the Knight Agency (they meet and court in “A Plague of
Rogues” and have been together ever since) and with Cynthia Wilmington in the
Black Knight Agency (where she has been with her girlfriend for about seven
years now, starting when they both were eighteen, within the story “Criminal
Ventures”). Lucas Swenson and Jeanne Carter are essentially friends with
benefits (especially as Jeanne pretends to be a guy), but further stories (if I
ever get around to writing them or professionally releasing the first two)
might see their relationship shift.
Why do movies often
fridge the girlfriend or wife or put her out of the picture in other ways?
One theory is that
writers simply don’t know what to do with a steady relationship. The courting
phase is interesting. There will be misunderstandings and quarrels and things
will be ever-shifting. But once a couple has come together and is planning their
life? Boring. So they usually kill the wife to motivate the husband/hero to do
something (latest offender? “Deadpool 2”).
Another theory is that
the audience doesn’t want to see the boring, regular life of the hero, because
movies usually are not about the regular life of a person (TV series are more
likely to do that, depending on the genre).
But is it really so
hard to keep a relationship going? I didn’t find it a bother to have Cedric/Cynthia
in my stories so far. Admittedly, they are both not living with their version
of Jane, but there still is a steady relationship in both cases. If they were
living with her, she would still be going on her missions in the Knight Agency
(and Cedric would accept that, even if it robs him of his sleep regularly) and
she would still be Steven’s right hand and second-in-command in the Black
Knight Agency.
You see, you don’t
have to put the partner prominently into the story of a movie - you can have
him or her feature at the beginning and show the hero returning to them at the
end. That’s perfectly okay. Or they can be doing background work, be some kind
of backup for the hero. Or they can have their own adventures. Or stand by the
hero’s side. What choice is the best is pretty much down to the type of person
the spouse is.
“Girl Reporter” (see
review here) features a long-standing relationship between two heroes, but
it obviously didn’t stop them from doing their job for a long time. And we’re
talking about a still sizzling, hot-making-out relationship, not about the
‘holding hands and giggling’ type.
Is it more boring for
the hero to be in a stable relationship than for them to have a new girl by
their side every time you see them?
James Bond is, of
course, the worst offender there, since he has a new ‘Bond girl’ in every
movie. But on the other hand, with Bond’s life, I can actually understand it.
Bond meets those women while in the middle of a mission (okay, that is also how
Jane and Cedric met, but still…). He is, as some have pointed out, a different
person outside of them. The suave playboy is partially a front, a character he
slips into while doing his job. Finding out that the ‘real’ James Bond is much
more boring can turn women off. Or the chemistry just won’t work outside of the
missions, when the adrenaline is missing. So they went out once or twice after
the mission, realized there was no more spark, and parted ways. That is okay.
It’s not as if James bonded more deeply with any of the girls more than once in
his life. And this one was killed off right after the wedding - talk about
downers, although I’m sure they had sex before.
So, what to do with
relationships, if you’re writing a series?
First of all, please
don’t try to stretch the ‘will they, won’t they’ phase out infinitely. At some
point, you have to owe up.
And if you decided to
have them get together, then why not find a way to keep them together and work
it into the story? You don’t have to make the spouse of the hero a main
character who is in every scene. Depending on their skills and character, they
can do background work or just go into hiding to make sure there’s no
additional way to put pressure on the hero.
Give a partner an
agenda of their own, even if it’s just ‘keeping themselves safe.’ Depending on
their own background, they can be a lot more, of course. Imagine a couple
together on the battlefield, fighting back to back, protecting each other that
way. Or the excellent pilot ready to get the agent out of the target area after
the mission.
“Despicable Me 3”
actually did a very good job with the evolving relationship not only between
Lucy and the girls, but also between Lucy and Gru, who are working together at
the beginning and the end. But then, the series has done well with keeping up
relationships introduced before - they also handled Gru’s new duties as a
father very well in “Despicable Me 2.”
Steady relationships are no
hindrance for heroics. Quite the opposite, they actually can make heroics
better. But you shouldn’t really follow the way it’s done in a lot of stories
these days. We have enough girlfriends and wives in fridges already.
No comments:
Post a Comment